Nevada is one of the nation’s largest solar markets, and conservationists want Nevadans to be aware of the federal tax incentives available.
Russell Kuhlman, executive director of the Nevada Wildlife Federation, is also a homeowner who installs solar panels. He realized that going solar isn’t cheap, but with newly expanded federal tax credits, you can get back 30% of your added investment.
Nevadans can also take advantage of net metering, which allows customers to use energy generated by a solar system to pay their monthly bills.
Kuhlman noted that the Inflation Reduction Act also includes incentives for more energy-efficient appliances.
“When I bought my house, everything was about 20 years old in terms of appliances,” Kuhlman said. “Now that I’m going solar, I’m taking even more advantage of these discounts on buying energy-efficient refrigerators, dryers, etc. So I’m hoping to combine all of these discounts and tax breaks.”
The Inflation Reduction Act included $8.8 billion to help increase home electrification and access to more efficient appliances. The Department of Energy estimates the rebates will save households nationwide up to $1 billion in energy bills annually and support more than 50,000 jobs.
Kuhlman noted that as more residential and commercial solar systems are installed, there will be less demand for what he calls “large-scale solar projects” on public lands.
“Reno and Vegas are some of the fastest growing cities with high potential for solar development,” Kuhlman said. “Trying to find a way to encourage these large-scale developments is another thing I think we should try to encourage.”
Yazmyn Pelaez, director of communications for the Nevada Conservation League, said solar investments can improve lives and homes as energy costs rise. He added that this is an opportunity to move away from fossil fuels and ensure that investments reach more communities.
“Not just landlords, but tenants,” Pelaez said. “We’re really working to make this transition as fair as possible because we want to make sure no one is left behind in this new clean energy transition.”
Pelaez acknowledged that many don’t have access to solar energy because they can’t afford to lease a solar system or have rooftops, but the community believes solar power can be a viable option. Such facilities are shared by community members who receive credits from their electricity bill for their share of the energy produced.
Disclosure: The Nevada Conservation League contributes to our fund for reporting on Citizen Engagement, Climate Change/Air Quality, Public Lands/Wildlife and Water. If you want to support public interest news, click here.
Get more stories like this by email
The first satellite launched by a nonprofit organization is now preparing to deliver data on methane pollution from oil and gas facilities around the world.
The MethaneSAT satellite, supported by the Environmental Defense Fund, will help monitor methane emissions, a major contributor to global warming.
The advocacy group is focused on making data transparent, accessible and actionable, said Jon Goldstein, the foundation’s senior director of regulatory and legislative affairs.
“It’s going to help government, it’s going to help industry and it’s going to help communities who want to know, ‘What’s going on in my backyard?'” Goldstein said. “They will have this open, online source of information.”
Goldstein emphasized that the data collected should hold accountable the more than 50 oil and gas companies that pledged to “zero” methane and eliminate conventional gas flaring at last year’s COP-28 climate summit in Dubai.
Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency published new methane regulations that were adopted in 2023. New Mexico adopted its own regulations in 2021, specifically against leaks from small facilities.
The new satellite is designed to measure known sources of methane and to discover and quantify previously unknown sources. Goldstein noted that this would allow companies and countries to take action more quickly to help reverse the Earth’s rising surface temperatures.
“It’s a very powerful greenhouse gas; 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide, pound for pound,” Goldstein said. “That makes this a huge opportunity for people who want to quickly fix this problem, get out there and fix these leaks.”
New Mexico, second only to Texas as the largest oil-producing state in the United States, MethaneSAT was launched last week from California’s Vandenberg Air Force Base.
Disclosure: The Environmental Defense Fund contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, and Public Lands/Wilderness. If you want to support public interest news, click here.
Get more stories like this by email
As the effects of climate change mount, New Yorkers and people across the country are fretting about the environment.
Environmental grief, also known as “solastalgia,” has become a growing response to climate change. A 2020 survey by the American Psychological Association found that almost 70% of people feel that climate change is affecting their mental health.
Reverend Chelsea MacMillan, a New York organizer for Greenfaith, a multi-faith climate action organization, said the group hosts grief circles for people to grieve about climate change.
“People are saddened by the decline in bird populations, the number of bighorn sheep, that are dying in the Sierra Nevada due to extreme weather,” he said. “It snowed heavily last year.
MacMillan added that people also lament the shorter and warmer winters. He sees a growing sense of hopelessness in these circles in response to a lack of political will.
Countries around the world are moving towards a climate-friendly future, but it is uncertain how effective these efforts are. United Nations report 2022
finds that global greenhouse gas emissions are falling. However, it is not fast enough to limit global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees by the end of the century.
While circles of grief focus on environmental issues, they are sometimes open to current events as well. MacMillan said people also suffer from a growing sense of indifference to the world. He noted that this distress has even caused some to question their faith.
“I think they see a lot of clergy and faith leaders not responding to these crises and instead focusing on the afterlife or their homogeneous communities and how we protect our homogeneous communities from these perceived threats in the world,” MacMillan said. .
MacMillan believes that times of crisis can strengthen one’s faith. He thinks that faith is not waiting for God or some higher power to save the day. Rather, it is to be an active participant in listening to the cries of the world.
Disclosure: GreenFaith contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environmental Protection. If you want to support public interest news, click here.
Get more stories like this by email
A proposed urban reforestation program in Massachusetts aims to help cities mitigate the effects of climate change.
The legislation would create a state advisory board to help municipalities choose the best time to plant trees and which native species would be most effective in reducing urban heat islands created by large concrete slabs.
Rep. Steve Owens, D-Watertown, said funding would be prioritized for neighborhoods with less than 20% tree cover.
“Things like choosing optimal sites, analyzing existing tree cover,” Owens said. “It’s something people may or may not be able to do on their own.”
Owens noted that neighborhoods are losing trees to development and environmental factors faster than they are being replaced. He said studies have found that trees not only keep neighborhoods healthier and cooler, but are also linked to reduced crime.
The urban reforestation plan will build on Massachusetts’ long-running Gateway Cities Greening program, which aims to plant more trees in areas economically affected by the loss of manufacturing jobs.
Owens noted that many areas are considered environmentally fair neighborhoods, with more wooded areas and higher particulate matter in the air.
“It’s not only important to deal with the first dozen because they have the fewest trees, but because they’re typically the ones most affected by pollution,” Owens said.
Owens added that increased tree canopy cover is both a climate mitigation and carbon sequestration solution, which could help Massachusetts reach its goal of net zero emissions by 2050. The bill was introduced by the state’s Environment and Natural Resources committee.
Get more stories like this by email